Zapier vs Make vs n8n in 2026
The honest comparison from an automation consultancy that takes no platform commissions. When each wins, when each loses, and how to choose for your UK business.
The short answer
No platform is universally best. They fit different shapes of buyer:
- Zapier wins for non-technical teams running 1–3 step workflows. Easiest to learn, most expensive at scale.
- Make.com (formerly Integromat) wins for complex visual workflows with branching, mapping and data manipulation. Good for ops teams.
- n8n wins for engineering-led teams, high-volume use cases, and businesses that want to self-host. Best price-to-power ratio.
For most UK SMEs we work with at Watermelon, the answer in 2026 is a hybrid: n8n for backend workflows and high-volume integrations; Zapier or native HubSpot/Salesforce/Shopify automation for workflows owned by non-technical users.
We take no commissions from any of them.
Side-by-side feature comparison
| Capability | Zapier | Make.com | n8n |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visual workflow builder | Linear, step-by-step | Visual canvas with branching | Visual canvas with branching |
| Branching / conditional logic | Limited (paid tiers) | Strong | Strong |
| Data mapping / transformation | Basic | Strong | Strong (incl. JS code) |
| Custom code steps | JS/Python (paid tiers) | JS modules | Full JS/Python execution |
| Webhooks | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API steps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| AI / LLM steps | OpenAI, Anthropic, others (native) | OpenAI, Anthropic, others (native) | All major + custom; strongest agent support |
| Number of app integrations | 7,000+ | 1,800+ | 900+ (+ generic HTTP) |
| Self-hosting | No | No | Yes (free, fair-code) |
| Multi-environment | Limited | Limited | Yes (self-hosted) |
| Version control / git | No | No | Yes (n8n offers JSON export, community git workflows) |
| Audit logs | Paid tiers | Paid tiers | Self-hostable / Enterprise |
| Error handling / retries | Basic | Strong | Strong |
| Sub-workflows | Limited | Yes (sub-scenarios) | Yes (sub-workflows) |
| Test mode | Basic | Strong | Strong |
| Mobile editing | Yes | Yes | Yes (web responsive) |
| Built-in scheduling | Yes | Yes | Yes (cron native) |
Pricing comparison (rough 2026 UK pricing for similar workloads)
| Tier | Zapier | Make.com | n8n Cloud | n8n Self-hosted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | 100 tasks/mo, 5 Zaps | 1,000 ops/mo | n/a | Free |
| Starter / Core | £20/mo, 750 tasks | £9/mo, 10k ops | £20/mo, 5k workflow executions | + £5–£30/mo for hosting |
| Mid (typical SME) | £49/mo, 2,000 tasks (Professional) | £29/mo, 40k ops (Core) | £50/mo (Pro) | + maintenance time |
| Heavy use | £100/mo, 10k tasks | £130/mo, 200k ops (Pro+) | £450/mo (Enterprise) | scales linearly |
| At 50k operations/mo | ~£250–£600 | ~£40–£100 | ~£50–£150 | £10–£40 |
The 50k operations/month row is where the price gap becomes massive. Zapier is roughly 4–10× more expensive than Make or n8n at SME scale. If you're running more than ~2,000 tasks per month, the cost case for moving off Zapier is usually decisive.
When each platform wins
When to choose Zapier
- Your team is non-technical and the workflows are simple (1–3 steps).
- You need a workflow connecting two niche apps (Zapier has the largest integration library by a margin).
- Your monthly task volume is under ~2,000.
- You're prototyping an idea and want the fastest path to a working automation.
When to choose Make.com
- The workflow has real complexity: branching, data manipulation, error handling.
- It's owned by an ops or operations-adjacent team comfortable with a visual canvas.
- You're running 5,000–500,000 operations per month and want a managed platform.
- You want strong native HTTP, JSON and webhook support without writing code.
When to choose n8n
- You have engineering capacity to set up and maintain the platform (or you use n8n Cloud).
- You're running tens or hundreds of thousands of operations per month.
- You need to self-host for compliance, data sovereignty or cost reasons.
- You want to commit infrastructure to AI agent workflows (n8n's agent support is strongest as of 2026).
- You want git-friendly workflow definitions and proper multi-environment deployment.
The hidden costs people underestimate
Three per platform:
Zapier
- Task-counting model. A 5-step Zap is 5 tasks per run, so a workflow firing 1,000 times a month is 5,000 tasks — not 1,000.
- Many "premium apps" (HubSpot Pro fields, deeper Salesforce, paid integrations) require higher-tier plans.
- Lack of branching forces you to build multiple parallel Zaps to handle conditional logic — multiplying task count.
Make.com
- Operations-counting is more generous but every module call counts. A complex scenario can rack up operations fast.
- The visual canvas gets hard to read past ~30 modules.
- Documentation gaps on newer features; community support is good but slower than Zapier's.
n8n
- Self-hosting time. Setup is fast (1–2 hours) but ongoing maintenance is real: backups, version upgrades, monitoring, sometimes performance tuning.
- Fewer prebuilt integrations than Zapier (though the generic HTTP node fills most gaps).
- If you're not engineering-led, the learning curve is steeper.
What we actually recommend at Watermelon
For a UK SME below 30 staff with no engineering capacity and modest automation needs: Zapier first, Make.com when you outgrow it.
For a UK SME 30–200 staff with at least some engineering or RevOps capacity: n8n as the backbone, Zapier or native platform automations at the user-facing edge.
For a UK business with compliance requirements (financial services, healthcare, legal): n8n self-hosted on your own infrastructure is usually the right answer for any workflow touching client or patient data, because the data never leaves your perimeter.
In all three cases, the most expensive option is not the platform — it's failing to set up version control, monitoring, error handling and ownership. Those matter more than the choice between platforms.
Related reading on Watermelon
- Business Process Automation in the UK — pillar guide that contextualises platform choice.
- Automation Consulting — how we help with platform selection and migration.
- AI Automation Agency — for AI agent workflows where n8n's agent features matter most.
Ready to talk?
If you're stuck between platforms, the free 30-minute call is the right next step. Bring the workflow you'd most want to automate. We'll tell you which platform we'd use and why.
Stuck between Zapier, Make and n8n?
30 minutes. No deck. Tell us about the workflow you want to automate. We'll tell you which platform we'd use and why.